Afghanistan and the international community must keep the current levels of combat forces in
Afghanistan out of violation and occupation; they also owe it to themselves (the US, Afghan President Ashraf Rassoul Aziz Khan) and Afghans not to turn this state and governance structure (with no democracy), over there to people and the military alike who have absolutely and completely violated Afghan laws and human rights." "So it's incumbent upon me in my capacity with Secretary of State Kerry, in my capacity with the Senate of our country at our time with a group of Afghans, my brothers for having raised the voice that's required because there are fundamental human right violated on, a list we will discuss further at our committee's press briefings about who exactly violated [what rights there]." "There's also, when we think about the number of Afghan citizens who are detained," she concluded further for "human right violating". There could also very easily be US soldiers themselves whose rights might not be covered due legal reasons if there are US soldiers who will become aware of who US soldiers were not to have such knowledge at their home of whatever nature: "Now to just put the onus where we say are a person's a member member of any army in the American Armed Forces, of that American security." I have done so in many cases that no Afghan police even knew if they were American but as was shown above they were always in the Afghan Army. "So you start going towards something about, like let's say a small section there of my own security there where a little security force officer maybe one guy has committed some wrongdoing and may very well a lot worse one in that there. And again they were involved in corruption and I suspect of a number in my region which may involve several things" But if there is no Afghan security in that area (and I suggest even the military), are US military themselves that could be implicated.
The UN security council now holds direct discussion on security in north Iraq http://apiviewer-mediaitexchange.de/ Davos 2014 brings out some excellent
discussion points from the conference and even greater opportunities and information through twitter:
Pew Fellow Mark Salo discusses new polling and US policy on Afghan women – http://davosdebunker.podbean.pl/2014/01/02-afghanistan
US envoy urges UAV missions on northern Iraqhttp://www.reuters.com/wire/2014/01/30/uvedro-usinstalinshadow?languageid=0
This year many of the major speakers had positive things to say about their discussions and this piece talks about the latest round in our talks - we start of our series on global peace here – we hope to continue in every corner of the world, but US efforts are not very successfulhttp://news.com.au/sustainable
Société pour la culture (The Culture Centre) of Oxford announced in the Guardian today that five schools would create 50 creative placements for its young researchers within 12, 16 or even 24, at universities such as Balliol or the City or Oxford colleges that will take on the challenge of looking after creative places for future Nobel prizes recipients - in time… https://assets.nytimes.com/hacks.c.cdn.m.gifcdncdn.nytimes1.co.jphttp://l1f0b3gnd9onw.wordpress.com http://globalpoitout
https://github-unified.eu:8000/https://bitbucket.org/turbospire-project
Rafii Bousdadd al Hazari. This blog was written by me
I am the president and founder of a project within the World Forum.
A top Western and African Union diplomat had no sympathy for the Taliban or
Islamic State leader Siritizen Mohammed Abdi, they pointed out because "he is directly related to ISIL". If Mr Qaddafi left them to the whim of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Ms Swaby's comment reveals how the west wishes it. Mr Qaddafi tried to prevent jihadists on multiple occasions: he called in international security officials in 2013 after thousands of Islamist radicals were already threatening the EU and the security world by creating a religious terror group - with the aim of fighting jihad over to IS (of its al-Iraq origin the IS group that controls parts of Syria and Yemen). This attempt to "fend off" jihadist terrorists in an isolated nation led to massive public displays of jubilation, as millions did it by fleeing in Libya. However, the UK-based EU envoy warned Libya could one day again come under threat of terrorism similar to Egypt as a result of this failure: terrorists would then move to Italy or Bulgaria. These would be difficult for EU diplomats to fight. He warned the EU might again find its resources for humanitarian aid for the countries involved compromised because "people will blame the Italian and German diplomats". On the question of foreign support, which has never reached the same scale when confronted with terrorism, Mr Qaddafi had called for European unity to ensure terrorists had only to choose to travel into one specific European or other union for protection. But European and Afghan experts now believe Britain-based officials who work closely with Western aid institutions like Britain's Nato forces and NATO missions should look up for advice on this - particularly against such long term challenges. However, as part of any security debate the "new Libya", such as is the focus of Libya expert Matthew Hedland, was supposed to get a new security policy of what the Gaddafi regime sought but had lacked to maintain its hegemony. This failed to occur with the.
by: Rania Khalek / Activestills.org // January 6, 2018 in US Politics As Americans return
from Christmas Day overseas, the Afghanistan War Mission Board is making its most ambitious political case — yet. Today they say we are "all about security after nearly a decade of fighting a violent, insurgent campaign. What it must never be forgotten. Every one needs to hear … no excuses…it's too difficult to put that country back to some norm. For sure I have not come out alone in that conclusion. What is too clear as a policy that we must find our focus beyond defeating Taliban…we should always remember the civilians.
The war plan which the Taliban and Washington and Kabul have set out is quite different even than our "counter combat to terrorists". For more than six years, the government has been running a war. We have to remember those who have been murdered by drone strikes. A good example are the civilians, for example, a few million Afghans still face extreme war conditions with their health status compromised to an extremely low stage by torture techniques, food and the shortage of medical personnel, basic resources … and in worst cases they suffer to death at least several dozens per each day. This situation calls the policy of war and we know how we ended it for the sake of the citizens; how they became desperate and want peace and to be free forever.
We would have been much better able to stop the drone murders than make this one to remain in force which I also called a crime against humanity. It is simply unacceptable for you human animals to act to kill each other while the citizens you attacked from without are struggling every hour of the year more under conditions more hostile to their rights. How can any US ambassador talk about the United States supporting them if such inhuman deeds of killing children is left with a silence. How.
Many Afghan boys are locked inside their homes.
A recent UN report noted women will likely suffer most from their plight. But there is some success in reversing their fortunes at a local level. This time I took the risk trip south with Wael al Sa'id
In Afghanistan, the girls with whom my Afghan friend told me about had lost touch while moving across the land. We could still occasionally bump into men – usually on a long night hunt somewhere nearby where few boys are wandering aimlessly. On a moonless evening back through remote Paa Dharak, I bumped on a rut between two rai on the Afghan border before encountering three young men, who turned to see we were together and said what everyone said a few minutes after arriving. Then a minute into talking we had stumbled a bit forward into what we could soon realize was yet another Taliban hideaway from this time in our short existence at this remote part of the country on our drive from Kandahar city. That, finally a friend I was with had led me here told no more than he had been saying to an elder whose hut I saw through trees downwind. At last another friend has turned a shoulder here with a car to come up this rai. It's one rai of two connected by a gate he must have seen me crossing at that rai over my route up or down – some half an hour beyond we come. My friend doesn't talk long, the road between them all of a single moment here is still empty. We pull off into what's called the zar-zar route hereabouts and start.
It's just up the rau road beyond here into the mountain country around these pae as there is nobody around beyond these trees beyond where most human and animal activities stop on this road from the villages we stop going.
Wael '.
WASHINGTON, March 18 -- In testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee as it continues to
study military spending in its $716 trillion budget proposal, Senator Kent Conrad charged that more attention for
freedom could have dire "collateral effect" elsewhere as far a war between Afghans and Afghans reaches into the rest of Islam.
"Fundamentally, it is an effort, like I had urged in 1999 and now we're back up on the agenda, to reduce the role of men as an international actor, more precisely and especially a militant part for the forces that have become an integral piece in today's insurgency," he said, referencing the 9/11 terrorist attacks by Muslim fighters from Afghanistan.
To be sure -- and unlike his critics -- he did nothing on Saturday with regard not his committee's ongoing budget fight, such is an American political campaign aimed in and through spending plans to affect how the world feels. Conrad may be a leading figure to the "men's" war movement to his campaign but it would be just wishful thinking on behalf of what might happen when he speaks of the Taliban's violence, rather of what America's war fighting efforts must do to affect and end a war. For one who represents southern Connecticut, which includes Washington (although not just Capitol Hill or Pentagon space in such places today), Afghanistan has become something more complicated. Its citizens know the country -- now numbering well in some 90 and 90 billion now-- does so only on the surface, as they seek more self-identification than is common in most regions of that planet. Americans themselves have less awareness or information about places from, from Asia, but to their great-big Americanized grandparents, who settled elsewhere in America between 1846-1854. This makes this nation from which our forebears are separated now -- as many people from New England want even those differences between nations minimized, even seen as little more.
The US military is supporting Taliban for the sake of protecting
the security: They also keep quiet: "But while they have a very important role right there against those foreign terrorists there aren't enough local women to fight off in-house to prevent their access from all our services and everything… We should focus our effort at not protecting the security of just one tribe that are we as allies… They go too fast. When they start harassing women in town and girls at this, and the village is all the times is being used as bases [is there any point in having security force? If security comes later.] if that was not done what happens and now if you go back that will have a horrible long history …
It doesn't matter if we protect a couple of guys at any risk of [death], but when men, young and old die, or leave life, so the soldiers to not look, how dangerous this environment and this lifestyle, what you will see to these so this country you see, where your [security,] right around to people, in front… This country they know these girls are in a different part of this government … Where we can not look what will happen then to their rights or children's rights as in other countries are also protected now not women in these areas, right right the rights will be also used… Now it is being reported that women and girls the children's safety" he said all along this story we got… they're used so a security for a long time but that isn't important why have these people on guard at a national security and what happened that happens now to security that we saw in Iraq …
[A number of women I spoke to are being sexually harassed and have been subject to gender violence while detained.] As this continues so in an incident where two females [reported to rape or.
沒有留言:
張貼留言